The faces iv package includes the family communication. Perceptions of communication, family adaptability and. This latest revision was deemed necessary because previous versions of the instrument have produced scores that are often linearly related to. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces ii. Assistant professor, university of bergen, department of psychosocial science, division of developmental psychology, oisteinsgt.
The reliability values of the scores of each scale in this study are presented in figure 2. The family cohesion subscale is part of the relationship component of the instrument. Faces instmment, a 111item, selfreport index, was developed in 1978 in the dissertation. Those authors organized these two aspects into a circumplex model to illustrate different types of families. Family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii in romania. In the original reliability and validity analyses, the testretest reliability was 0. These were slightly modified faces r on the basis of pilot data and were administered to 42 clinic families families seeking or receiving psychological services and 206 nonclinic families.
Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale ii faces ii. Correcting it entails the sum of odd items for cohesion dimension, and the sum of even items for. The circumplex model of marital and family systems and the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales faces, have been used in over 1,200 research studies and have also been widely used in clinical settings over the past 25 years kouneski, 2002. Faces iv family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. In over 250 studies using the family adaptability and cohesion scales.
Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv 12. Pdf the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. Using the 5 point likert scale provide below, please indicate the degree to which you agree or. We took this approach to avoid the problems encountered by the family adaptability and cohesion scale faces. This study examined the relationship between adolescent adaptability, cohesion, and adolescent problem. Communication, family adaptability and cohesion were examined separately for adolescents and for parents, and significant relationships were found. Its validity and reliability in a midwestern sample by bruce p. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale 331 int j clin health psychol, vol.
Psychometric properties of the spanish version of the family. This 6item scale measures family interaction and cohesion. Reliability and validity of the family satisfaction scale. The concept of cohesion has also been applied to family units. On the other hand negative feedback seeks to maintain status quo. Olson and colleagues delineated two aspects of family behaviors. Family functioning was measured by the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales ii place, 2005. This provides for the stability within the family system. However, the criticism of the curvilinear hypothesis of the circumplex model has always been from an empirical point of view. Family cohesion involves the interplay between an individuals autonomy and emotional bonding on the part of family members. Use of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales in child clinical research. Criminal justice program bowling green state university the circumplex model of family functioning, which includes measures of cohesion and adaptability, was used with a community.
The most current version, faces iv itself, is comprised of six family scales two balanced and four unbalancedof 7 items each, making 42 items. Our approach centered on a threeway comparison of published research. The most current version, faces iv itself, is comprised of six family scalestwo balanced and four unbalancedof 7 items each, making 42 items. Building on the expanding cross cultural interest in faces, the spanish version of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iv, aimed at the assessment of the dimensions of cohesion and flexibility of the circumplex model, was validated following the author. The interdyadic agreement between adolescents and parents was low. Adolescent scores on communication, family adaptability and cohesion were significantly lower than parent scores. The family adaptability and cohesion scale iii in a. Pdf portuguese validation of the family adaptability and. This 30item, selfreport instrument was constructed to examine the frequency of. Family members should complete the instrument independently, not consulting or discussing their responses until they have been completed. Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv the family adaptability and cohesion scale facesiv was developed to evaluate the adaptability and cohesion dimensions in family interactions. Pdf family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale. Family adaptability and cohesion scale the national.
Differences in family cohesion, adaptability, and environment. The faces 11, a 30item selfreportquestionnaire, measured the two dimensions of family behavior, cohesion and adaptability. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. The family adaptability and cohesion scale facesiv was developed to evaluate the adaptability and cohesion dimensions in family interactions. The original family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales.
Fill in the corresponding number in the space provided answer sheet. Pdf family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. Background the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iii using the circumplex model has been widely used in investigating family function. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces was viewed as a useful tool for a period, but has been less popular of late. Family adaptability and cohesion scale the national child. The family adaptability and cohesion scale facesiv was developed to evaluate the adaptability and. This study evaluated whether samples of adolescent repeat offenders, young adult prisoners, and adolescent nonoffenders were discriminated. University of wisconsingreen bay, 1982 an abstract of a masters thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of science department of family and. Family cohesion and adaptability in relation to family. Oct 20, 2019 family coherence, family adaptability, and family type. The present study examines the differences among latino families who are in the low, bicultural, and high acculturation stages on measures of family cohesion, adaptability, and environment. Family cohesion, adaptability and composition in adolescents. At one extreme of the adaptability dimension a family is very chaotic, and. Full text of family adaptability and cohesion evaluation.
An evaluation of the family adaptability and cohesion. The family adaptability and cohesion scale iii in a norwegian sample ingrid dundas cand. The hypotheses of the current study attempt to expand and. Six scales were developed, with two balanced scales and four unbalanced scales designed to tap low and high cohesion disengaged and enmeshed. Factor structure and reliability of the revised family. This is the latest version of the faces olson, 2011. Pdf family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation. Again including all four family stages, the scores for. Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv statistics. Two basic assumptions of the circumplex model of family systems were evaluated. As previously mentioned, the fss was modified for use in followup interviews for this longitudinal study. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iv was developed to tap the full continuum of the cohesion and flexibility dimensions from the circumplex model of marital and family systems. The faces iv olson, 2011 is the latest version of the faces instrument assessing family functioning through two main.
The findings suggest that there is no statistically significant difference between parents of both research groups on the cohesion, adaptability dimensions of family fimc. The family adaptability and cohesion scale iii in a norwegian. A psychometric study of the family adaptability and. May 24, 20 family genogram, family circle, family apgar adaptation, partnership, growth, affection, and resolve and family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces are the most common tools to assess family function. Pdf the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation. A problematic approach to the mea surement of cohesion has been to use group process. The major hypothesis of the circumplex model is that balanced couple and family systems tend to be more functional compared to unbalanced systems. The two dimensions are family cohesion and family adaptability. Psychometric properties of the facesiv in a pediatric. Family cohesion, adaptability and communication the pennsylvania child welfare training program 203. As mentioned before, data supported a sixfactor structure of the instrument, three scales for cohesion enmeshed, balanced cohesion, disengaged and three for flexibility chaotic, balanced flexibility, rigid. Faces was designed to be curvilinear, that is, midrange scores would be healthy and very high or very low scores would be dysfunctional. Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv 12202010.
This study examined the relationship between adolescent adaptability, cohesion, and. In the present study, a reduced version of faces ii. The family cohesion scale is a nine item scale intended to measure the degree of commitment, help, and support family members provide for one another. Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the greek version of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales iv package faces iv package. Family genogram, family circle, family apgar adaptation, partnership, growth, affection, and resolve and family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces are the most common tools to assess family function. Associations between family cohesion, adaptability, and. To determine the dynamics of the family in terms of family cohesion and family flexibility in order to plot the family on the circumplex model. Pdf relationship between family adaptability, cohesion. In order to inform broader development and implementation of interventions to promote generational resilience in migrant and refugee families, we investigated available literature on the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces, a measure of family functioning. Department of social work bowling green state university richard d. Family cohesion and adaptability evaluation scale of d.
The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iii using the circumplex model has been widely used in investigating family function. Maps are built on the circumplex model prepareenrich. As that model has been criticised so the value of this dimensional evaluation has also been doubted. A family with and adaptability score between 15 and 39 is described as rigid, between 40 and 45 as structured, between 46 and 54 as flexible, and between 55 and 70 as very flexible. Psychometric properties of the spanish version of the. The facesii will assess family relationships and family organization, the fras will assess family resilience, and the dscc will assess quality of life. Pdf family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii in.
University of wisconsingreen bay, 1982 an abstract of a masters thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of science department of family. The majority of the elders g growth essentially refers to the realisation of emotional growth due to the freedom within the family to change roles. The circumplex model focuses on the three central dimensions of marital and family systems. Very low cohesion suggest that family members view themselves as disengaged. All family members over the age of 12 can complete faces iv.
Family, couple, adaptability, cohesion, communication, circumplex model, gender, 1. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales faces, a measure of family functioning, contains three scales. Introduction one modality of conceptualizing the family is using the cohesion, flexibility and communication constructs, proposed by olson as the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iii, the faces iii, or the. However, there are no generally accepted, robust definitions for placeet althe family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale original papers. Family cohesion assesses the degree to which family members are separated from or connected to their family. Family adaptability extent to which the family system is flexible and able to change. This sixitem scale measures several aspects of the closeness of a family unit such as time spent together and emotional connection. Factor structure and reliability of the revised family adaptability and cohesion scales. Validity of the faces iv family assessment measure. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. Relationship between family adaptability, cohesion and. Pdf relationship between family adaptability, cohesion and. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iv. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces.
This might be a good instrument for programs that attempt to improve parentchild relations. Pdf the objectives of the study are a diagnosis of romanian family using family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii, and interviews find. Faces iii, developed in the family social science department at the university of minnesota, is designed to measure family cohesion degree to which family members are separated from or connected to their family. Abstract family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iv faces iv brazilian adaptation the aim of this study was the semantic adaptation of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iv faces iv for brazil. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales faces ii this instrument measures parts of the circumplex model of family functioning. It is the emotional bonding that family members have toward one another. This paper looks at its use in families with two very different types of problem to assess its discriminatory ability. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales core. Over 1,000 studies have been done using faces and it has become one of the most popular selfreport scales for assessing family functioning. Preliminary results revealed a significant difference in age of migration among the low acculturation and the bicultural and high acculturation groups. Family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii in. Jan 29, 2014 a family with and adaptability score between 15 and 39 is described as rigid, between 40 and 45 as structured, between 46 and 54 as flexible, and between 55 and 70 as very flexible. Assessment of family functionality among the elderly with chronic illness.
1093 1261 1605 812 531 393 463 902 1189 1074 1010 512 235 907 1669 265 1273 1156 31 34 319 366 829 839 1245 384 360 1337 885 1278 515 36 484 1114 471 280 136 825 879